Which case established that police must provide Miranda warnings during custodial interrogation?

Which case established that police must provide Miranda warnings during custodial interrogation?

• A. Berkemer v. McCarty
• B. New York v. Quarles
• C. Miranda v. Arizona
• D. Powell v. Alabama

Answer: (C)

The main concept is that police must give Miranda warnings to protect a suspect’s Fifth Amendment rights before any custodial interrogation. In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that statements obtained during custodial interrogation are inadmissible unless the suspect was informed of their rights to remain silent, to have an attorney, and to have those rights explained so they can knowingly waive them. This decision established the requirement that warnings be given prior to questioning in custody, and that any waiver of rights must be voluntary, knowing, and intelligent. Other cases deal with related points but not the general rule itself. Powell v. Alabama focused on the right to counsel in major-issue cases; New York v. Quarles created a public-safety exception to Miranda; Berkemer v. McCarty clarified how custody and warnings apply in certain roadside or traffic-stop scenarios. The case that established the Miranda warning requirement is Miranda v. Arizona.

The main concept is that police must give Miranda warnings to protect a suspect’s Fifth Amendment rights before any custodial interrogation. In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that statements obtained during custodial interrogation are inadmissible unless the suspect was informed of their rights to remain silent, to have an attorney, and to have those rights explained so they can knowingly waive them. This decision established the requirement that warnings be given prior to questioning in custody, and that any waiver of rights must be voluntary, knowing, and intelligent.

Other cases deal with related points but not the general rule itself. Powell v. Alabama focused on the right to counsel in major-issue cases; New York v. Quarles created a public-safety exception to Miranda; Berkemer v. McCarty clarified how custody and warnings apply in certain roadside or traffic-stop scenarios. The case that established the Miranda warning requirement is Miranda v. Arizona.